Alright, I really hate to be the bearer of bad news but here we go.
What you've written is just sorta…uninteresting. It's possible that this would've succeeded back in Series I when most concepts were new, and cliches weren't overdone to death yet. But in Series V, everything is so complicated and strange that this wouldn't really fit well. Conceptually, your SCP is a big frog. Unless you can think of something really (and I mean REALLY) interesting that this frog does, and you fix the issues I've mentioned, it's unlikely that this concept will succeed. In addition, this consistently fails to have clinical tone, spelling fails sometimes, you include imperial measurements (the imperial system sucks, IRL, and for the Foundation) and your spacing is really weird. I'll take this opportunity to correct some of your formatting though.
Object Number:xxxxxxxxxx
Object Classification: Euclid Safe
It should look like this:
Object #: XXXX
Object Class: Euclid
This is a Euclid class object (not Safe), as sentient objects capable of movement are almost always Euclid, unless they're Keter, which this isn't. Refer to the locked box test. Also, the special containment procedures are split up into like five 1 sentence paragraphs. Don't do that.
Recovery logs are usually done like this: Addendum:XXXX.1: Recovery
However, because the recovery log adds nothing to the SCP (nothing interesting or scary happened), and the foundation never bothered to erase the memories of the people who saw it, you don't need a recovery log.
I recommend you go to the Ideas and Brainstorming forums to get the base concept changed.
