A lot of this work has spelling and grammars in it. Sometimes the article is referred to with a dash (SCP-XXXX) and sometimes without (SCP XXXX). The former is the correct one. Some words aren't correct ("At the end of each day, personally involved in the think tank"). I'd recommend reviewing this for spelling and grammar fundamentals before continuing on.
The interview log is fairly wooden. I don't think people actually talk like this.
Also, there's a lot of unnecessary detail here. Your article is very long and overly detailed about storage, latin phrasings, tool use, full history, etc. But the structure of the piece is a lot of random events that don't actually seem to come together for a cohesive experience. Information is given to me more or less at random, but none of it seems necessary.
I'd ask as a reader: What exactly are you trying to accomplish here, and are all those aspects helping you accomplish that thing? What is your direction as a writer? I can't see it.
