SCP Foundation

Update #1:

• A humanoid with tree-like skin needs help protecting its (family? village? species?), so it tried getting in contact with the Foundation (hoping to appeal to the "Protect" part of SCP). It's being interviewed in a dimly lit room.
• The interviewer speaks of the Foundation in third person under the guise of formal tone.
• The humanoid says how the GOC is looking for its (family? village? species?)-they live in a secluded place the Library doesn't have a direct Way to, and can't get out without help-and tells the directions to their place. This is a mistake because:
• At the end of the interview, the "Foundation" it got in contact with is revealed to be GOC in disguise (possibly by turning on the lights)
• The entity starts broadcasting in magic, something like: "The Bookburners are coming. I'm sorry." before being burned to a crisp.

I don't know about this, since not only does it kind of require foreknowledge of the GOC, it also seems pretty unnecessarily roundabout to facilitate the "it's a trap" reveal.

The interview is possibly done under some sort of no-lies oath.

Then what's the point of the whole "we can help if you give us information" setup?

The interviewer concludes the interview: "I promise the Foundation shall not harm you…because there'll be nothing left to harm when we're done."

This just seems incredibly cheesy and unnecessary. Plus it makes it obvious to the interviewee that something's up.

Seek refuge from the Library. I lo- (gets killed before completing the sentence)

Shouldn't it be "in"? Also, not everyone has access to the Wanderers' Library, and those who can get there shouldn't need to be told "go to this place". Also, this seems like a lot of words to say as a warning.

Overall… this feels kind of overdramatic? And kind of contrived? I admit that I personally don't feel like this would be that entertaining, unless you have some other interview content that's a lot more engaging.