Author, you really should slow down your posting. Not only are you unnecessarily creating extra sandboxes for each draft (tab coding is available on the front page of the sandbox site to allow storage of multiple drafts on the same page), none of the drafts you've posted are particularly workable so far as concept and writing quality go.
Writing-wise, you have a lot of overly casual sentences, as well as a lot of material that kind of indicates a lack of understanding of how the Foundation works. For example:
SCP-XXXX cannot be contained, and due to its nature has no need to be contained even if it could.
Even if something can't be physically contained, the Foundation will still write up containment procedures with misinformation or concealment protocols to keep the public from learning of the anomaly. If there's no need to contain something, then the Foundation wouldn't have written up an SCP article about it. (Also, there's a "be" missing at the end of the sentence, otherwise it sounds like a fragment.)
Designation SCP-XXXX-343 belongs to "God" on the painting, as the Foundation found it appropriate that both SCP-343 and SCP-XXXX-343 are God
This is an unnecessary crosslink (see the Crosslinks Guide for information on more meaningful, beyond the namedrop ways to mention other SCP articles in your drafts) and also a potential information/secrecy breach. If someone has access to SCP-XXXX's documentation but not 343's, then there's no reason to include this sort of snippet (and again, it seems unprofessional).
You need to get your base ideas polished up in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before you immediately start drafting. Go to that forum, post a quick summary of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone asks), and reviewers there can help you make the idea more interesting and give you some advice on structuring the eventual article for smoothness of reading and narrative.
