I'm loving the 105 reference
Date: 11 Nov 2008 22:42
Number of posts: 63
RSS: New posts
I knew that when I clicked the discussions link, at least one person would mention that experiment. Good on you.
I wonder if it works on people who have been switched by the gender switcher 113? 112? one of the 11-somethings.
Awwwww, they should "bomb" the gayest man alive….
This is cute.
Really? I just don't see how it meant to be horrific, or scary, or well, anything… This does not seem to fit the site at all. What am I missing?
this is literally the dumbest fucking thing on the site.
Agreed. Foweraker was right.
It's outrageous, I'll give you that. But dumb? Apparently not so dumb that no one hasn't actually thought about it (there's a wikipedia article link in Moose Fisher's post). I think it should stay as it is, precisely because it is so outrageous. The phrase "Truth is stranger than fiction" should never be applied to the SCP Foundation.
Can't believe I never read and downvoted this before. Not because of the concept — I understand why it was used, but because one-third of the article is "humorous" addenda, and also (unless I just haven't had enough coffee): You have a bomb. An old-fashioned WW2 bomb that explodes, not a metaphorical bomb. It's unstable. It detonates. *You still have it.*
What is wrong with this picture?
SCP Wiki Senior Citizen Staff | Thank you for testing my new memetic Forum sig