As mentioned in the summary, I have a roughly completed draft here. However, I do not think it's up to site standards quite yet, specifically in the addendum and description.
I'm hoping for constructive critique as well as idea bouncing on where might things go better. The draft is fairly long, so I will attempt a shorthand of what I'm going for below:
SCP-XXXX is a collection of pictures frames that slowly warps a person's personality. Long term exposure to a single picture completely swaps the subject's personality for the object in the picture frame, but long term exposure to SCP-XXXX while activated seems to also have a negative effect.
More specifically, people who have SCP-XXXX around them for extended amounts of time with a photograph will begin to exhibit stress and paranoia, as well as behavioral changes. Something I'm trying to do more subtly in the addendum documents is show that being around any activated instances of SCP-XXXX for too long (it can be different instances, as well as different photographs) will result in a change in behavior as well. There's also a none too subtle dig at parents dismissing children's concerns about things as works of imagination, which is where this idea originates. I should probably scrape one of these two ideas so I can properly develop the other, but I'm rather attached to both.
Any feedback is appreciated. Please be brutal. I've always coasted by in writing classes, and I'd like to be subject to a proper critique. :)
Edit 2.0: I figured out my problem with tabbing. It's fixed so the proper piece for review is now front and center.