SCP Foundation

SCP-XXXX is currently not contained; re-containment is not a priority.

Ummm… The first thing about the Foundation is: Secure, CONTAIN and Protect.

Should SCP-XXXX be contained, only personnel of the Baha'i faith are permitted to interact with the object.

I would change to: "…permitted to interact with it."

SCP-XXXX shall be contained in a 3x3x3 meter room

Ok, first off… Your initial paragraph says: "SCP-XXXX is currently not contained" and now you are providing very specific containment procedures? If you use such specific containment procedures, you really need to spell out why they are so specific.

Anybody of a Abrahamic, Vedic, or otherwise messianistic faith is to be barred access to the object.

It's "messianic" and the whole tone of the sentence is off.
I would change to: "Personnel of Abrahamic, Vedic or any other messianic faith are not permitted to access SCP-XXXX."
And, you need to specify why they are not permitted access. Does it cause an XK-Class End of the World scenario? Does it just piss the SCP off? What difference does it make?

All religious material produced by an instance of SCP-XXXX-A is to be intercepted by Foundation agents, and compulsive religious segments are to be redacted before being distributed.

Again, tone issues… "Any material of a religious nature produced by an instance of SCP-XXXX-A are to be intercepted by Foundation agents and any infohazardous religious segments are to be redacted before being allowed to be distributed."

Under purview of senior researcher Aurang Ghuṣn-Esfandyar, the effects of SCP-XXXX are currently being documented.

If it's not contained, and no effort being made to contain it, how are they studying it?

Very little exposure to a candidate faith will trigger the effect of the item, self professed agnostics or atheists react in accordance with their cultural upbringing.

Couple of issues here: 1. The first part of the sentence doesn't make sense as written and I'm not sure what you are trying to convey. 2. This should be split into two sentences with a period between "item" and "Self-professed". (Also, it is "self-professed".)

I literally skimmed this article and, regarding MadCatUSA's comment, it was pretty obvious to me at least why people of the named faiths weren't allowed to have the item. I don't think clarification is necessary; in this case you're allowed to allow the reader to connect the dots. I don't see anything indicating that containment breach results in SCP-XXXX being completely unobtainable through, for example, literally taking the object back after someone has been exposed to it, so I don't think it's necessary to go into detail.

That also makes me pose a question that I don't think the article necessarily answered: does SCP-XXXX-A have to remain in contact with SCP-XXXX in order to experience its effects over an extended period of time? Or can SCP-XXXX be taken from SCP-XXXX-A after exposure and have its effects still continue? Might have missed this in the article.

My general comment on this article is pretty much in agreeement with Professor Will: some might find it in poor taste, resulting in downvotes. It's possibly (possibly) clever enough to avoid that reaction, but I sort of felt like exploiting "acceptable targets" drove this article, and I don't follow any of the named religions. I get that there are many SCPs that make reference to religion, but the detail with which the description goes into explaining history associated with religion makes it stand out more here.

I like the inclusion of other miscellaneous details, like the memetic effects of material written by SCP-XXXX-A. Interesting concept. But the whole thing needs to be treated very delicately to work. Right now there are frankly plot holes in the containment procedure and description.