SCP Foundation

I like it except the last paragraph… seriously, what idiot parent would bring their kid to a super-secret test facility to be friends with a living plague?

I like the idea, but not this article.

1. Do not use the SCP's "name", it's too informal for these kinds of articles.
2. Stop making the SCPs look like attractive human teenagers. Seriously.
3. General formatting.

Fix it up and we might have a winner.

What those guys said. I like the idea, but it's executed badly.

I tried to punch up this article a bit.

Made it a bit more detached, tried to severely tone down the 'I'm describing an X-men anti-hero' feel. Tried not to change anything about the actual SCP, since I felt guilty enough for the faux pas :X

Seems much better now.

I like the results. Admittedly, she is a bit supervillain-ish, but most humanoid SCPs have a "metahuman" feel. I find this one scientifically believable enough. Good work on the improvements.

You know, I'm actually quite fond of her now, as a sort of self-referential mockery.

I mean, you give enough people powers one of them is going to start believing they're an X-man like Vector here.

I would like permission to brainwash this SCP and use it as a personal hotlab for my studies in pathology. ~Dr. Dumount

Possible uses for Vector's powers. Disassembling viruses and putting them together in a different configuration to make vaccines. Also breeding gene engineering viruses and possibly stemcells.

I'm curious to see the effects of SCP-500 and/or SCP-427 on Vector (possibly just a blood/tissue sample, since it's clear that the Foundation doesn't want to cure the subject herself). It might lend some insight into the nature of 500 or 427, to see if they will reverse an infection simply by virtue of being an infectious agent, or if they will attempt to return the subject to 'optimal' health, whatever that may mean for that individual. What will the impact of the panaceas be if the infection doesn't represent a threat to the host, or if it's actually beneficial to the host as one might argue for 353?