SCP Foundation

Okay, wow, I'm really scared to put the whole thing out there. I'm tentatively calling this the 'final' draft, but if it needs more work, so be it.

I have a couple things I would like to know, but by no means feel stuck to any guidelines.

-What did you like about my SCP?

-What did you dislike?

-Do you think it would survive as a Series III SCP?

-Would you vote up, down, or not at all?

As always, I appreciate all the help from everyone. Here's the link: http://scpsandbox2.wikidot.com/deacon-kessler

EDIT: Fixed the typo you pointed out, kilen, and noted.

Anyone? :'(

It's just like something from a creepypasta. No real original concept, no interesting narrative, nothing really unique at all.

Articles like 096 work because, despite the somewhat boring monster, they craft a compelling narrative around them. Just describing the monster itself without anything else to grab the reader's interest isn't something lots of people will be crazy about.

Okay, so. It's a monster that eats bones. Um. That- that's really it. Like you have a recovery, and it makes sense it'd hide out there, but that's not really much in the way of a story and the anomaly itself isn't interesting enough to stand without a narrative.

I get what you're trying to do with the tests and whatnot but its digestive system isn't interesting enough to warrant a note, much less a note at the end of the article. It's not like this is the first anomaly that has an abnormal digestive system, I'd think the Foundation would just go "okay" at this point and leave it at that if it's going to be such a pain to test, and that seems to be the attempted weight of the article.