This might not be the best advice in the world, and I'm sure others could offer better help, but I think I can offer something worth your time.
I want to start of by saying that a better place for this thread would probably be the General Advice Forums. (I may be wrong here.)
Articles like SCP-1322 sometimes have quite a bit of scientific terms in both the Containment Procedures and the Description, (testing, event, and/or discovery logs too). However, it only works because parts like…
SCP-1322 is to be contained in a sealed spherical Class-VIII containment chamber with ablative inner surface, hardened against particle beams, nuclear and conventional explosions, and corrosives
…and…
Procedure 1322.CD.S311 is to be initiated if atmospheric pressure should exceed 6.00 x 10-2 Pascal. As an anti-pathogenic measure, radiation levels within the containment chamber should be maintained at no less than 4.50 roentgens per second.
…make actual scientific sense in context, and can be understood by the reader without too much difficulty. (You might have to google a thing or 2, but you shouldn't have to spend a week studying quantum physics just to understand one part of a skip.)
Don't try to dumb down the science too much, either, because the Foundation probably wouldn't do that. Like, a footnote to clarify what the Lorentz factor is would be O.K, but a paragraph explaining the concept of atoms as if the reader doesn't even know what the difference between Hydrogen and chocolate pudding is, would be excessive. A good rule of thumb might be to assume that all readers have at least high-school level knowledge.
In short, as long as the science isn't impossible to understand, and it isn't something that you just pulled out of your ass, like "SCP-88888's memetic radioisometric properties can only be counter-causated by the semi-mascular nasal introduction of Beta-Red Class magnesium trio-sulfonic xenofluorate acid capsule-form amnestics" you should be fine.