SCP-2886's sandbox, my first SCP. Please let me know if you like it and if not, please tell me what i should improve.
Link here:http://scpsandbox2.wikidot.com/xenoxp
Why does that disclaimer need to be there? I see no particular reason that this needs to be kept hidden from personnel.
Keter
This thing is Euclid.
in a container measuring 14x16x14 meters, made of stainless steel.
Why those specific measurements and materials? If there is no specific reason (i.e. big enough to hold it and the walls can be made of anything), then we don't need such specifics.
New researchers at site-3█ is to be informed, that usage of SCP-2886 is strictly forbidden.
How was it tested, then? If you mean personal use… well, that's common sense and doesn't need to be mentioned. Also, don't half-hide domething like that, hide it completely or not at all. By half-hiding, you're narrowing down the location to between Site-30 and Site-39. Finally, specific sites shoukd always be capitalized.
Only d-class personnel and class-b amnestics is to be tested in SCP-2886-A.
It's "D-Class" and "Class-B." Also, tone issue. "Are to be used in tests involving" is better. Also, why must amnestics be used in the first place, on D-class?
SCP-2886 is to be locked at all times except testing.
Common sense, doesn't need to be in the procedures. Also, never put in all caps, underline, bold, or italicize for emphases, unless it's in a direct quote.
Level 4 Clearance is to be used with SCP-2886.
I don't see why only site heads should ge overseei g this thing.
Since SCP-2886-A is uncontainable,it is to be monitored by the foundation from [REDACTED], or through SCP-2886 itself.
First, always captialize "Foundation". Second, as the SCP is the only way into or out if that universe, it is contained so long as the portal itself is contained. Finally, do not use redactions in the Procedures. This is essentially a how-to guide on containing an object- if we're missing information, then a breach is more likely to occur. The only exception are site designations, under the logic that the people who are authorized to view the report already know where it's located at.
Any items or creatures that emerges from SCP-2886-A is to be Studied at research unit-██ thrown back immidiateley.
First, "are to be". Second, I see no reason why they MUST be thrown back through the portal.
SCP-2886-A is not to be used as dispose of dangerous SCPs, such as SCP-682.
You can kill the 682 reference here. Besides, the Foundation rarely disposes of SCPs, dangerous or otherwise.
One (1) NASA spacesuit designed by Dr.[REDACTED]
If Dr. Redacted designed it, the suit isn't made by NASA.
- Four (4) 10 liter gas tanks
Assuming that the pkace us a vacuum, such tanjs would need to be incorporated into the suit's design.
Testing with SCP-2886-A requires O5 approval.
… Why? Bothing about this SCP strikes me as needing such high precautions.
SCP-2886 resembles 10 meters tall and 6 meters wide portal completely made of pure obsidian.
"Resembles" is not clinical tone. It either is or is not.
It is unknown who and why build SCP-2886,while the foundation testing confirmed that SCP-2886 is approximitely two thousand (2,000) years old.
First, it would be "who built SCP-XXXX and why". Second, that's iffy tone, and may be best left out entirely.
SCP-2886's material is completely carved, possibily by [REDACTED].
Bad redaction. Rule of thumb, if you can mention something completely outlandish in place of the redaction and it still makes sense in context, it's a bad redaction.
Exploration of SCP-2886-A is possible, but only in teams of three (3),
Why only 3? If it's a limitation posed by the Foundation, it needs to be in the procedures.
The area itself is simmiliar to our known universe, as it looked approximitely 10-12 billion years ago.
So, the Universe looks like our own shortly after it was formed?
The galaxies located in SCP-2886-A (SCP-2886-B-X, while the „X“ represents a number) is much smaller than the known galaxies.For example: Average galaxy is approximitely 80-100 Kpc, average SCP-2886-B instance is approximitely 3-8 Kpc in diameter.
Science fail. First, the Milky Way has an estimated diameter of 55 kpc… at the largest estimate. And we're considered a fairly large galaxy (though not the largest). Second, galaxies that formed shirtly after the Big Bang would be small.
The stars itself are much more luminous then regular stars, and is composed of antimatter.
We have no way of confirming this without taking a sample. Which is impossible under current technology. Furthermore, if the stars are made of antimatter, then so is anything else in there. So we wouldn't have to worry about anything coming through, since they'd basically immediately detonate, taking the Site and our end of the SCP with them.
A large black hole (SCP-2886-C), approximitely 100 Mpc in diameter is to be seen on southern side of SCP-2886-A’s „vacuum“.
We can't visibly see a black hole unless it's eating something. Furthermore, if that universe expanded like ours, a quick calculation would mean that the black hole of that size would almost immediately devour anything passing through the portal (and thr portal itself), as its event horizion is about as large as that universe.
SCP-2886 has been first discovered in 198█, after reports of [DATA EXPUNGED].
Again, bad redactions.
immidiateley arrived to escort SCP-2886, attempted to ruscue missing people in SCP-2886-A, While missing people were never found.
I'm not following what you're trying to say here. Escort the SCP where? And thete's something missing between trying to tescue the missing people in the SCP, and said people never being found.
Milky Way 100 Kpc
Like I said, the largest size estimate of the Milky Way is about 55kpc.
Andromeda Galaxy 200 Kpc
Andromeda is about 65kpc accross.
You don't mention anything about stuff passing from the other side until that last addenda, which us problematic if it's a tegular occurance.
On [DATA EXPUNGED], Dr.[REDACTED] came up with the idea, that SCP-2886-A is a real part of our universe, where "Everything ends".
Based on what criteria, exactly?
A core issue here is that you are taking inspiration from the earlier Series I almost exclusively. This is a problem, as much under that section was written when standards were more lax then they are now. I recommend that you read more Series II and III articles, to get a feel as to how things are done now.
Also, you're lacking a narrative, a story. In this case, I can see this SCP potentially get by without one, relying on it becoming an exploration-based SCP. However, that requirement still requires fairly good execution, and you may want to think of the stories you want to tell with this thing. For inspiration, when you read those Series II and III articles, see how the objects are used, rather than just what they are. And take a peek as SCP-093 and SCP-1859 for good examples of an exploration-based SCP.
Finally, take a gander at this guide on how to use redactions.
One last issue is the requirements for really high information security by Foundation standards- what is it about this thing that makes the Foundation want to hide it from most of it's own personnel? If it's some kind of future vision of our universe… well, we have millions, if not billions, of years before reaching that point of doom.