The formatting is way off.
Fixed that. Unnecessary mistake
not with easy-to-measure numbers
Yes you're right, cube has at least to be as twice as large as the orb is. Fixed that.
The use of "primary containment"/1CS is a little confusing.
Hmm… true, because it would only make sense, if at least 4 sections would become necessary. Fixed that. (I left the specification for the outer containment zone)
belongs in the containment procedures.
I guess, its just a qustion of taste. Some put this in the scp's, another in the description. However I fixed that.
I don't buy the "computer animation" note.
Actually, it IS just a black circle. However this is accurate, how SCP-XXXX would appear to a human, similar to a black hole. I don't know how to create a more realistc picture. Maybe I can find somthing in google or the picture section, otherwise I'll need to change the caption. For now, I left them both.
Try to avoid using words in "scare quotes". In-universe, the person writing the document is a professional, who knows the correct terminology to use.
Oh yes this is true. The document has to be professional, the quotes I guess, are another topic.
I fixed the document.
I'm not entirely sure if this even makes sense. Wouldn't it wreck the physics of the surrounding environment?
SCP-XXXX is impossible, and that's because it's an anomaly.
I had to stop reading before the addendum because I really didn't have any clue what was going on. It's a dark ball thing that eats energy? Maybe someone better-versed in physics would understand this
Do you want to say, I should add footnotes? No, it was my intention to leave (not too many) uncleared points for the addenda. Ok maybe wrong term. Let us say, I wanted to explain it further in the addenda. And understanding problems may originating in my used english. At this point I recommend you to fix speech and grammar mistakes. Maybe you also can enhance the terminology a bit?
Your last paragraphs are referring to a plot of the story? If I get you right. Hmm… many of the articles don't have either. Another one have… maybe it would enhance the reading experience… I'm thinking about it.
At least… don't I say "energy" too much, I do? May you leave some intentions how to fix this?