Firstly, it would be helpful if you used proper formatting and bolding!
The book that causes the reader to commit suicide is an idea that's been done multiple times before; the compulsion effect is boring and adds no conflict whatsoever - there's no way to avoid it, no way to overcome it, ergo, no conflict.
The play is also exactly what you'd expect to happen if you were going to affect someone with prophetic dreams. They see something in the future, it might drive them mad - which, btw, isn't all that clinical in tone. DO they go mad bc that's how most people would react to something like that? Is it really anomalous? The idea is just overly linear and the reader can guess what happens before it starts.
-5 and -6 are "random object generators" that are simply too broad to hold any real interest. Great! they can summon or transform anything and anyone. There's no way for us to figure out what it does, no further mystery that hold our attention.
The one that intrigued me most was -4 - the conversion of landscapes into the cataclysms described in poetry definitely has a nugget of gold in it, so to speak. I'd like to hear more about this one, why it was created, if it works how it was intended to… etc.
The erotic novel feels entirely too similar to SCP-1004 to be successful.
