Downvoted due to similarities to SCP-055…whatever it is.
Very nice article. I like the attached document, though it's pretty critical to the main one. Perhaps enough that you might want to trim down the main article and make the link more prominent to better emphasize its importance.
I thought about including it as a collapsible, but thought it would make it a big bulky. I think I can make it more prominent, though. One minute…
Better. I'd put it below the rating module, though. Also, it seems odd that the Foundation is requiring personnel to read a document that has a double-digit chance of leading to nasty infection and administration of high-powered amnesiacs.
I would imagine they would assign personnel to the project they are okay with risking. Besides, only the few people who actually guard/administer the item need to know anything beyond the basic document. With testing indefinitely suspended, I'm not even sure there's anyone required to know what's in it.
I quite like it. :3
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
I like this one… I'm not 100% sure why, but I do. +1
Having clicked the incredibly verbose test file first in the "recently created" page, I was waiting for it to be some sort of meta-piece explaining a rash of wordy, unwieldly new entries lately…. Which (done well) would also have gotten a +1 from me.
I am very conflicted about this. The main article is very similar to 370, and attached document - to 931 (and, by proxy, to the Toaster). Also, the main article don't work at all without the document, and that is wrong. I think I would have liked a tale based on this concept. The way it is now I really don't know if I like it or not.
Downvoting the article and upvoting the document.