Isn't using the standard template, poor scientific notation and tone all over, and an extremely gratuitous object obviously created for the purpose of having long log entries.
There's just nothing there to hold it together. It may as well be a single sentence long and you'd convey the exact same amount of information.
Your changes have literally done nothing to change the fact that this SCP is nothing more than "a water fountain that makes people think that it produces liquids other than water".
SCP Articles aren't stories, but there's a certain amount of storytelling that has to take place in order for a concept to have a hook, and by extension appeal. You've done nothing other than to raise a "what-if-this-exists" scenario, and without some form of exploration of this concept, it will fall flat on its face.
There's also dozens of minor issues with formatting, notation, and tone, but I'm not going to bother to address those until there's enough meat in this draft to bear feedback.