I was initially a little iffy about this, because it seemed like the Foundation was being unnecessarily cruel to poor Agent █████. But looking at it again, that's not really the case. They gave him a proper bed after it became obvious he might not get out for some time, if ever, and the initial bad vibes I was getting off Dimaccio's footnotes (and subsequent site transfer) went away once I read them in the context of a former MTF superior watching his friend and teammate sink into depression and anger without being able to do anything about it. Realistically, Agent █████ is probably being treated quite well for an SCP victim-turned-object. Whatever privileges he's given are just not mentioned in the article proper, since he's a special case and therefore they're not necessary for containment.
Anyway, even before I came to that realization, I was still going to upvote. Whether I agreed with their treatment of Agent █████ or not, you told the story you wanted to tell and I enjoyed it.
One thing confuses me a little, though. This collapsible:
Ethics Committee. Level 3 and above only.
I can't quite figure out what the Ethics Committee part is referring to. Is it saying that in order to access the interviews, you must both have Level 3 clearance and be a member of the Ethics Committee? The wording is a bit unclear.