Anonymous (74.193.168.x) 28 Jul 2008 15:30
this is pretty cool. i really like the idea of….
what was i talking about?
SCP-055 / Discussion
Forum
» Per Page Discussions / Per page discussions
» SCP-055
This is the discussion related to the wiki page SCP-055.
Anonymous (74.193.168.x) 28 Jul 2008 15:30
Remember? You were about to say you liked… wait I'm not really sure…
Edit: my apologies for replying to a 4 year old post. I just don't even check the age of the most recent comment on such a good page.
Edit: well I just realized (after observing on another thread that new posts are added to the bottom of the last page) that I replied to the OLDEST post on this thread. Oops…
Well, ironically enough, you're replying to a 3 year old post by a user who both hasn't been active since 2013 AND who edited an apology in their post.
Only nerds have signatures
yeah i hate when people bump old threads. even if they are only a couple months old.
Okay, calling a stop to this line of conversation since it's starting to become spammy. One ironic facetious comment about bumping old comments is more than enough; four is excessive and the joke is past stale.
Do not reply if you are not a staff member. This is a closed staff post.
One of the things that I ADORE about SCP-055 is that it inspired SCP-3125 & the entire anti-memetic site. Anti-memes are *so cool.*
Okie, I stop talking about things that nobody care about now ^^;
You know, it was the…um…
Does it even exist anymore? I thought…What the hell am I talking about?
Well, we know it's not…um…
What was I going to say
Wow! This is easily one of the best! I can't believe I didn't read this one until now.
I found the SCP Wiki, and read this one in particular first, from reading the comments on http://qntm.org/?halfway
Love this one
I vote in favor of this, for the lulz.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
There's already an entry for SCP-404. You'd have to renumber that one as well.
Neither have any relevant backlinks, a switcheroo between the two would be feasible.
The current SCP-404 is, while interesting in theory, executed in what I feel to be a rather tasteless (not to mention uninteresting) manner. It is this siege weapon's humble opinion that the "Manila Envelope" SCP could be deleted outright, and no one would miss it.
~EDIT~
I fail at typing.
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
How about we simply name it SCP-404-J?
It worked with SCP-173-J, SCP-999-J, and SCP-666-J, so why can't this one
How about we simply name it SCP-404-J?
It worked with SCP-173-J, SCP-999-J, and SCP-666-J, so why can't this one
Do you have ANY idea how old this is?
Pointless.
Because that is not a good reason to relocate a famous and super-highly-rated SCP, particularly to the joke list.
I would not want to see this article treated as a joke, and I'm sure many others would feel the same way.
h
It isn't a friggin' -J, and the joke is less funny now that it's 2013 and not 2009.
For what it's worth, I concur in the statement that re-numbering to 404 would be *hilarious*. :)
Goddamn what a necro-reply. There's no way the numbers are gonna be switched now for such a corny little joke, anyway.
Also, happy +200 to 055!
About the addendum: But wouldn't the fact that it's an anti-meme, in fact, be one of those "negations of fact" thingies, since SCP-055 is most definitely not a meme…. we think.
I propose that we hereby begin to refer to this SCP as "the SCP that is not SCP-055".
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
This is quite worrysome… but I don't remember why, just that it wasn't something with good implications
*grin*
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
Wow… I forgot this existed. Not even joking. And I find that I even posted a comment on it that I forgot. Holie shit
Except part of you will remember it IS SCP-055, in which case you'll forget about it completely.
Wait, what? What SCP isn't SCP-055? Do we even have an 055?
I did not hate this article before, but I am positive that I do not hate it after the addendum that was not bad about not necessarily forgetting what the object is not was not… necessarily… what was I saying?
/forum/t-77225/scp-055#post-
page revision: 3, last edited: 22 Sep 2018 03:57
