Um, isn't the whole thing about O5's that they cannot have any contact with SCPs whatsoever?
Date: 29 Jul 2008 03:19
Number of posts: 33
RSS: New posts
Heh heh heh… Yeah, actually they're not, but I figured, since they are the directors of the entire Foundation, they wouldn't be above bending the rules in their favor once on a while. Plus, the thing is harmless unless you look at it too long, or you have nothing you feel guilty over.
What happens if you ahve nothing to be guilty over?
I gotta say, there are very few people who could work in that position and not feel crippling guilt with that thing. For that matter, there are very few people who could work in that Foundation and not feel crippling guilt without that thing.
I just stumbled upon this one and had to mention how much I dislike it being in the possession of an O5, especially after reading SCP-884.
If this were submitted as a brand new entry today, I think it would very likely get downvoted into oblivion within less than a week. Either that, or drastically rewritten.
thank you for the reminder. downvoted. i never liked this, which is the reason i didnt give it any vote before.
Missed voting on this too, before. It's not offensively bad, but it's got just enough sheer "meh" that I've downvoted it as well.
Proposing deletion at -6
Piffy is an SCP Foundation Moderator, Lv. 9001 Squishy Wizard, and Knight of the Red Pen.
Admin, SCP Wiki
Eehh… Alright, Bright.
"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato
Thirding for ARC
When this is deleted, can the reason be:
"this was a horrible SCP, it was very very bad, and everyone involved should feel bad bad bad bad!!!"
Hello, gentlemen. I'm simply posting here because I stumbled upon this SCP and upon reading the description, I realized I have a small statuette that perfectly matches it: A long-faced, brightly colored tramp. I apologize if this isn't of any real importance, I'm rather new here and I felt the need to point it out.