SCP Foundation

I don't know, I personally like it better when a game streamer for instance could play the game decently and only fails when an honest mistake is made—an incompetent streamer is funny as a meme but not for long.

A game would be far more enjoyable if it's competently made, a glitch-filled monstrosity like ME:Andromeda would gain scorn and just frustrates the players. An incompetent enemy character would just leave bad aftertaste and gives you no satisfaction in defeating them, while incompetent protagonist character just makes you want to let them die and leave the game for good.

A certain level of competence is needed to make a piece believeable and enjoyable.

Competence isn't entertaining, is it?

I headcanon the Foundation as hyper-competent, so… yes, competence is entertaining. For me, anyway. I like reading about a job well done even against unfortunate odds.

Aside from some joke articles, there are only so many things the Foundation can be portrayed doing completely wrong before it doesn't even feel like the Foundation anymore. Suspension of disbelief is an important aspect of writing an SCP article.