SCP Foundation

TGEDragon The feedback you are providing is vague and can be misleading. Do you like the article? If so, why? Did you not like it? If so, why not? What could make it better? The little amount of things you have pointed out could hurt an author more than help to staff prioritizing threads with no responses. Also, the little number of things you have pointed out may lead an author to believe that the draft is mainsite ready when, in all reality, it may not be. If you plan to do future critique please go more in-depth.

TGEDragon, this feedback is not very helpful to the writer, considering there are more problems than just those small items.

You mean the exact opposite.

Why would they mean the exact opposite? It makes sense as they state.

Also, when writing a draft you should instead say SCP-XXXX.

There's no hard and fast rule about this. When writing your draft, you can technically use any number or placeholder until your draft is ready for the mainsite, as long as you change it.

Also, SCP-349 is taken.

It's likely the author knows this, but, if not, it's the same as above - people can use any number as long as they adjust it when it's ready for the mainsite.

Remember that staff prioritises giving feedback based on the number of posts a board has - you're reducing a board's visibility with very, very limited critique when this author (like many) needs an in-depth critique.

_{ETA: Sniped by Alces_alces, but the points here still stand!}

Yup, I'm aware 349 is taken, that was just a placeholder for me.

And I'm not sure i meant the opposite. We see the person inside the bubble moving very slowly, so a second inside would last hours for us, unless i'm mistaken

"considering there are more problems than just those small items."

Oh boy :p