Definitely good enough for an upvote, in my opinion, but the dialogue feels a bit cheesy.
Date: 20 Mar 2014 23:21
Number of posts: 12
RSS: New posts
I'm kind of split on this. It's a good article and all but I think the fact that you took the whole 'physical manifestation of a nightmare' and went with a feelsy article left me feeling just a tad disappointed at the end. +1 nonetheless, can't always have everything my way I suppose.
Upvoted for the interview, being a decent dream-related skip, and continuing from 1498, which I did not expect to ever have a continuation.
That said, there are numerous spots where the writing needs some brushing up. Though I don't consider the interview one of them; it occurred to me that the Doctor isn't talking to a little boy, but something else, so why wouldn't it talk like that, really?
Others have already pointed out the same issues with minor errors in the article that I would cite. I'm fine with the tone though, personally; I didn't get any weird feelings from it.
Has good clarity, isn't too long/short, holds attention to the end.
All in all, I say that although the wordage issues do need fixed, it's not enough to prevent me from just going ahead and upvoting it now. +1.