SCP Foundation

There's at least a couple of articles where "Access Denied" is supposed to be the title, aren't there?

I'm asking why shouldn't they be named if the authors don't care?

Probably because we don't have confirmation that the authors for sure don't care?

I'm totally fine with putting in a placeholder [UNTITLED] to indicate works that were never given a title.

Maybe the author forgot. Maybe they haven't got the right pun/meme for it. Maybe they just want it to be [ACCESS DENIED]. Maybe they want to name it after a certain milestone is achieved. Who knows? Who cares? It's a part of an article, which means it's the author's prerogative as to what it should be. Policing it would just put unnecessary burden on the staff.

If it is becoming a problem, as in making unnecessary confusion, then it should be changed. If not, then, as Rigen states, it would make a burden for staff. You could, in the future, make a policy where new posts have to be changed to [Untitled] if there is no name to stop this trend if you want. Just an idea, but something you would have to then police in the future. It all depends if it is causing an actual problem on the site or if it is just plain old annoying.