Author, please use a sandbox page as noted in the guidelines.
With regards to the draft itself, it will need a lot of reworking in order to stand a chance on the mainsite. First off, your containment procedures don't make a lot of sense. Why does the lockbox have to be titanium? Why not just keep it wrapped up in plastic in a padded case, and put in a standard secure locker? Who has access to the key and passcode? Level-3s?
The description has a lot of fluff text that can just be taken out because it's not that interesting nor important to understanding the anomaly (the entire first paragraph, for example, can be trimmed down by half. The audience doesn't really care about all these minute details, and if it tells time incredibly slowly, the audience can assume that the time is almost always incorrect. Also, wrong use of "it's", which means "it is" and is not the possessive word). It takes a paragraph and a half to actually get to the primary anomaly, which is pretty boring all things considered, since we see a ton of "predicts your own death" premise works that often get deleted since they're too bland and predictable. I suggest reading over this essay on common SCP pitfalls to get an idea of what elements to avoid putting in an SCP article.
If you're really insistent on writing up this particular concept, definitely get the base idea polished up in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before you try fixing the draft. Go to that forum, post a quick summary of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone asks), and reviewers there can help you make the idea more interesting and give you some advice on structuring the eventual article for smoothness of reading and narrative.
